TLA+ Conference and StrangeLoop 2022

-

Last week I traveled to the Strange Loop conference. I chaired the TLA+ conference held as part of pre-conf events. I will write about that below.

Strange Loop was my first developer's conference. I have mixed feelings. I will write about that as well.

Travel to the conference was eventless via Delta connection through Atlanta. Atlanta to Sait Louis gave me one hour on the clock because I moved from Eastern to Central time zone. I had gotten exit row seats, so I had ample legroom. I watched TopGun in the first flight (which was good), and watched half of Jurassic World Dominion (which was very lame, I thought it was a parody).

I arrived around 3pmish and dropped my backpack (I travel light) at my hotel room. I stayed at Drury Inn, which is right next to the conference hotel, Union Inn Station Hotel. The hotel was decent, they had decent hot breakfast. I walked to the Gateway Arch, and wondered around till the TLA+ Conference dinner. It was very hot at 95 F, but the temperature dropped quickly to 60s in two days.

We had a full day of exciting talks for the TLA+ conference. Check these out! The missing slides and videos will trickle in.

While I chaired the conference, a lot of the heavy lifting was done by Marcus Kuppe, long term maintainer of the TLA+ toolkit and big time TLA+ contributor. Follow Marcus's Twitter account for TLA+ updates. We are blessed to have Marcus taking care of TLA+ community.

We had around 40 people attending the TLA+ conference. The day before, Hillel gave a hands-on TLA+ workshop to 30 people. Hillel also joined the TLA+ conference, and I was delighted to meet him in person and spend as much time I could with him over dinner on Friday and lunch on Saturday. Hillel is a force of nature, he is full of energy. He distributed skillfully-made chocolates to attendees, and juggled for the kids people brought with them. Hillel's writing on TLA+ got the tool and methodology on the radar of many developers. His book on TLA+ and workshops are first-rate. Hire him for teaching a TLA+ workshop for your team.

Nikolaj Bjørner, co-creator of Z3, and partner researcher at Microsoft Research gave an overview talk about systems verification efforts. Z3 is a popular open source Satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) solver. SMT is a decision problem for logical formulas expressed in classical first-order logic with equality (propositional logic+ quantifiers + relations). You can think of Z3 as formalizing constraint programming. Z3 has been very influential and has picked up a lot of momentum with the improvements in hardware, parallel computing resources, and improvements in SMT as well. His slides are accessible here.

Nathan Fairhurst (Principal Engineer at Nike) gave a very engaging talk about the use of TLA+ at Nike. The talk had the best visuals I have ever seen. Of course, this is coming from Nike, what do you expect? Nathan had some nice gems in his talk. Here are some:

  • TLA+ gives you high quality rapid feedback that would take years to accumulate otherwise. Things like race conditions are impossible to get fast feedback.
  • You can be agile and use formal methods. We love TLA+ and it works great with Agile.
  • We now know what we are building will work. We go straight to the core of the problem. "Fifteen times better."
  • You don't always need formal methods. You don't always need a parachute either. In software, lot of people try to sew parachutes mid-air.
  • When we deployed, we had 5 known bugs in the system. Even though, we have never seen them, we knew they were there via TLA+ modeling. Deployment was a strategic decision. Every bug eventually happened, but we knew what we knew exactly what was wrong and how to fix it.
  • It is about value. We write TLA+ to serve our customers. Maximize work not done. Paper is cheaper than film.


Jack Vanlightly and Markus Kuppe gave their talk on using TLA+ toolkit to obtain statistical properties of the TLA+ models of systems. Wouldn't it be great if you could also get statistical hyper properties (abort rates, completion rounds, etc.) about your distributed system while you are safety-checking it with TLA+? This would allow you to optimize and fine-tune the protocol, all the while ensuring its safety-liveness properties via model checking. Using TLCGet and by adding a new "generate" mode to TLC, this is now achievable. Markus did two cool live demos (Knuth-Yao dice simulation with coin-toss protocol and Dijkstra-Safra termination detection protocol). We all gasped a loud WOW when we saw the real-time statistics about the protocol being model-check displayed live on screen. Jack talked about how he put this to real use when analyzing SWIM, RabbitMQ, and Kafka group configuration and balancing protocols. This is a great extension to TLA+. Here are the slides. These updates are in the nightly build branch. Markus set this up on my laptop after the talk. I think he and Jack will write about how to set this up and use this soon.


Finn Hackett gave a talk on Pluscal to Go compiler. We also had talks about the Apalache Symbolic Model Checker for TLA+.

Martin Kleppmann also attended the TLA+ conference. It was nice chatting with him about distributed systems during lunch and afterwards.

On Thursday night, Strange Loop took us to the STL city museum. It is a weird place. 100 year old 10-story warehouse is carved to add climbing staircases, tunnels, and all sort of oddities. It was fun.


Well, about the Strange Loop conference... This was my first developers conference. This was big with more than 1000 people attending. Before pandemic, the conference had seen double or triple of this number. That is too big and too general/broad for my taste. Here is the schedule. John Romero's keynote about "The Early Days of Id Software" was great!  There were 3-4 other talks I enjoyed a lot.

I left the conference just before the closing to catch my flight back. In the closing remark, it had been announced that the next Strange Loop will be the last in the series.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hints for Distributed Systems Design

-
This is with apologies to Butler Lampson, who published the " Hints for computer system design " paper 40 years ago in SOSP'83. I don't claim to match that work of course. I just thought I could draft this post to organize my thinking about designing distributed systems and get feedback from others. I start with the same  disclaimer Lampson gave. These hints are not novel, not foolproof recipes, not laws of design, not precisely formulated, and not always appropriate. They are just hints.  They are context dependent, and some of them may be controversial. That being said, I have seen these hints successfully applied in distributed systems design throughout my 25 years in the field, starting from the theory of distributed systems (98-01), immersing into the practice of wireless sensor networks (01-11), and working on cloud computing systems both in the academia and industry ever since. These heuristic principles have been applied knowingly or unknowingly and has proven
Read more >>

Learning about distributed systems: where to start?

-
This is definitely not a "learn distributed systems in 21 days" post. I recommend a principled, from the foundations-up, studying of distributed systems, which will take a good three months in the first pass, and many more months to build competence after that. If you are practical and coding oriented you may not like my advice much. You may object saying, "Shouldn't I learn distributed systems with coding and hands on? Why can I not get started by deploying a Hadoop cluster, or studying the Raft code." I think that is the wrong way to go about learning distributed systems, because seeing similar code and programming language constructs will make you think this is familiar territory, and will give you a false sense of security. But, nothing can be further from the truth. Distributed systems need radically different software than centralized systems do.  --A. Tannenbaum This quotation is literally the first sentence in my distributed systems syllabus. Inst
Read more >>

Making database systems usable

-
Image
C. J. Date's Sigmod 1983 keynote, "Database Usability", was prescient. Usability is the most important thing to the customers. They care less about impressive benchmarks or clever algorithms, and more about whether they can operate and use a database efficiently to query, update, analyze, and persist their data with minimal headache. (BTW, does anyone have a link to the contents of this Sigmod'83 talk? There is no transcript around, except for this short abstract .) The paper we cover today is from Sigmod 2007. It takes on the database usability problem raised in that 1983 keynote head-on, and calls out that the king is still naked.  Let's give some context for the year 2007. Yes, XML format was still popular then. The use-case in the paper is XQuery. The paper does not contain any  reference to json. MongoDB would be released in 2009 with the document model; and that seems to be great timing for some of the usability pains mentioned in the paper! Web 2.0 was in
Read more >>

Looming Liability Machines (LLMs)

-
As part of our zoom reading group ( wow, 4.5 years old now ), we discussed a paper that uses LLMs for automatic root cause analysis (RCA) for cloud incidents. This was a pretty straightforward application of LLMs. The proposed system employs an LLM to match incoming incidents to incident handlers based on their alert types, predicts the incident's root cause category, and provides an explanatory narrative. The only customization is through prompt-engineering. Since this is a custom domain, I think a more principled and custom-designed  machine learning system would be more appropriate rather than adopting LLMs. Anyways, the use of LLMs for RCAs spooked me vicerally. I couldn't find the exact words during the paper discussion, but I can articulate this better now. Let me explain. RCA is serious business Root cause analysis (RCA) is the process of identifying the underlying causes of a problem/incident, rather than just addressing its symptoms. One RCA heuristic is asking 5 Why&#
Read more >>

Foundational distributed systems papers

-
I talked about the importance of reading foundational papers last week. To followup, here is my compilation of foundational papers in the distributed systems area. (I focused on the core distributed systems area, and did not cover networking, security, distributed ledgers, verification work etc. I even left out distributed transactions, I hope to cover them at a later date.)  I classified the papers by subject, and listed them in chronological order. I also listed expository papers and blog posts at the end of each section. Time and State in Distributed Systems Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System. Leslie Lamport, Commn. of the ACM,  1978. Distributed Snapshots: Determining Global States of a Distributed System. K. Mani Chandy Leslie Lamport, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 1985. Virtual Time and Global States of Distributed Systems.  Mattern, F. 1988. Practical uses of synchronized clocks in distributed systems. B. Liskov, 1991. Expository papers
Read more >>

Advice to the young

-
Image
I notice I haven't written any advice posts recently. Here is a collection of my advice posts pre 2020. I've been feeling all this elderly wisdom pent up in me, ready to pour at any moment. So here it goes. Get ready to quench your thirst from my fount of wisdom. No man, think for yourself, only get what works for you. It is called foundations, not theory Foundations of computer science (or rather any field of study) are the most important topics you can learn. These lay down the frame of thinking/perspective for that area of study. Yet, I am saddened to hear these called as "theory", and labeled as "unpractical". This couldn't be farther from the truth. Take a look at how I recommend studying distributed systems . Don't you dare call this "theory" and "unpractical". This lays the bedrock that you build your practice on. Don't skimp on the foundations. Don't build your home on quicksand. Keep your hands dirty, your mind cl
Read more >>

Linearizability: A Correctness Condition for Concurrent Objects

-
Image
This paper is from Herlihy and Wing appeared in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 1990. This is the canonical reference for the linearizability definition. I had not read this paper in detail before, so I thought it would be good to go to the source to see if there are additional delightful surprises in the original text. Hence, this post. I will dive into a technical analysis of the paper first, and then discuss some of my takes toward the end. I had written an accessible explanation of linearizability earlier; you may want to read that first. I will assume an understanding of linearizability to keep this review at reasonable length. Introduction I love how the old papers just barge in with the model, without bothered by pleasantries such as motivation of the problem. These are the first two sentences of the introduction. "A concurrent system consists of a collection of sequential processes that communicate through shared typed objects . This model encompass
Read more >>

Scalable OLTP in the Cloud: What’s the BIG DEAL?

-
Image
This paper is from Pat Helland, the apostate philosopher of database systems, overall a superb person, and a good friend of mine. The paper appeared this week at CIDR'24. (Check out the program for other interesting papers). The motivating question behind this work is: " What are the asymptotic limits to scale for cloud OLTP (OnLine Transaction Processing) systems? " Pat says that the CIDR 2023 paper "Is Scalable OLTP in the Cloud a Solved Problem?" prompted this question.  The answer to the question? Pat says that the answer lies in the joint responsibility of database and the application. If you know of Pat's work, which I have summarized several in this blog , you would know that Pat has been advocating along these lines before. But this paper provides a very crisp, specific, concrete answer. Read on for my summary of the paper. Disclaimer: This is a wisdom and technical information/detail packed 13-page paper, so I will try my best to summarize the sa
Read more >>

Understanding the Performance Implications of Storage-Disaggregated Databases

-
Image
Storage-compute disaggregation in databases has emerged as a pivotal architecture in cloud environments, as evidenced by Amazon ( Aurora ), Microsoft ( Socrates ), Google (AlloyDB), Alibaba ( PolarDB ), and Huawei (Taurus). This approach decouples compute from storage, allowing for independent and elastic scaling of compute and storage resources. It provides fault-tolerance at the storage level. You can then share the storage for other services, such as adding read-only replicas for the databases. You can even use the storage level for easier sharding of your database. Finally, you can also use this for exporting a changelog asynchronously to feed into peripheral cloud services, such as analytics. Disaggregated architecture was the topic of Sigmod 23 panel . I think this quote summarizes the industry's thinking on the topic. "Disaggregated architecture is here, and is not going anywhere. In a disaggregated architecture, storage is fungible, and computing scales independently.
Read more >>

Designing Data Intensive Applications (DDIA) Book

-
Image
We started reading this book as part of Alex Petrov's book club . We just got started, so you can join us, by joining the discord channel above. We meet Wednesday's 11am Eastern Time.  Previously we had read transaction processing book by Grey and Reuters. This page links to my summaries of that book. Chp 1. Reliable, Scalable, and Maintainable Applications I love the diagrams opening each chapter. Beautiful! The first chapter consists of warm up stuff. It talks about the definitions of reliabilty, scalability, and maintainability. It is still engaging, because  it is written with an educator and technical blogger voice, rather than a dry academic voice. This book came out on 2017. Martin is working on the new version. So if you have comments for things to focus on for the new version, it would be helpful to collect them in a document and email it to Martin. For example, I am curious about how the below paragraph from the Preface will get revised with 8 more years of hindsight:
Read more >>