Do You Think I Am a Goldfish?
Academic writing has long been criticized for its formulaic nature. As I wrote about earlier , research papers are unfortunately written to please 3 specific expert reviewers who are overwhelmingly from academia. Given this twisted incentive structure ( looking impressive for peer-review ), the papers end up becoming formulaic, defensive, and often inpenetrable. Ironically, this very uniformity makes it trivially easy for LLMs to replicate academic writing. It is easy to spot LLM use in personal essays, but I dare you to do it successfully in academic writing. Aside: Ok, I baited myself with my own dare. In general, it is very hard to detect LLM usage at the paragraph level in a research paper. But LLM usage in research papers becomes obvious when you see the same definition repeated 3-4 times across consecutive pages. The memoryless nature of LLMs causes them to recycle the same terms and phrases, and I find myself thinking "you already explained this to me four times...