AWS Summit NYC, the rest of Day 2

-

In the afternoon of day 2, there were breakout sessions. Below are summaries from the ones that I found useful. There was also an expo on day 2, and my notes on the expo are towards the end of this post.

Building web-scale applications with AWS

This presentation opened with a customer anectode. As you may know, Reddit runs on AWS. When President Obama did an "Ask Me Anything" on Reddit recently, Reddit called AWS a day in advanced to give heads up. There were 3 million pageviews on Reddit that day, 500K of which was for the President's AMA. Reddit has added 60 dedicated instances and handled the extra traffic smoothly.

The presenter gave the takehome message in advance for his talk: While you scale, architect for failure, and architect with security. The rest of the presentation talked about these (mostly the first point) in more detail.

Architecting for failure. AWS has 9 regions around the world, and supports within each region different availability zones (AZs). An AZ is basically an independent datacenter. Use different AZs and regions to architect for failure.

There are various storage options for architecting for failure. There is S3, which provides durable (everything replicated to 3 nodes by default), scalable, highly-available storage. S3 also has good CloudFront (and also Route53) integration for low-latency access worldwide. Glacier provides a very cheap solution for longterm infrequently-accessed object storage, with 1 cent per gig per month. The tradeoff is that if you want to retrieve an object, this may take up to 5 hours for preparation (since it is based on magnetic-tape based storage). Finally, there is elastic block storage (EBS) which provides support up to 1 TB, is snapshotable, and is a very good choice for random IO.

Then there are database options, they provide a readily queryable system with consistency/performance options. A common use case for the database is for managing session-state for web applications. The session state store should be performant, scalable, reliable. Managing session state with the AWS database options achieve these, as well as divorcing the state from the applications (which is a great tool for architecting for failure). There are several options AWS provides for databases: DynamoDB, RDS (Relational Database Service), and NoSQL high I/O datastore solutions. AWS ElastiCache (protocol compliant with MemCached) helps provide speed support for these databases.

Data-tier scaling is the bane of the architect. It is still a hard problem, but AWS services can help make this a bit easier. There is no silver bullet, you just have to be aware of your options. First you can try vertical scaling, go for a bigger VM instance. For horizontal scaling, the simplest thing you can try is to have a master node and add read-only copies as slaves. (Using RDS and Oracle can create the read-slaves with click of a button.) If you need to go with the high-scalability version, this makes things more complex. This is the sharding and using hash-rings idea. You can shard by function or key space, in RDBMS or NoSQL solutions. DynamoDB provides a provisioned throughput NoSQL database with /fully-managed horizontal scaling/. Leveraging on its SSD-backed infrastructure, DynamoDB can pull this trick. DynamoDB is also well-integrated to AWS CloudWatch, which provided system-wide visibility into resource utilization, application performance, and operational health. Finally, AWS Redshift provides a petabyte-scale data warehousing solution optimized for high query performance on large-scale datasets.

Loose coupling.  When architecting for failure, another important strategy is to use/adopt loose coupling in your applications. The looser coupled your application is the better it scales and tolerates failures. AWS SQS (Simple Queue Service) is your best friend for this. SQS offers a reliable, highly scalable, hosted queue for storing messages as they travel between computers. You use SQS as buffers between system components to helps make the system more loosely-coupled. SQS allows for parallel processing (through fan outs) as well as tolerating failure. A relevant service here is the AWS SNS (Simple Notification Service) which can be used to fanout messages to different SQS based on detection of failure or more traffic. Also you can then add CloudWatch for auto-scaling: if one queue size gets big, you can set the appropriate response to acquiring additional AWS spot instances. (AWS spot is the name-your-own price option for VMs, sort of like PriceLine but for VMs.)

Finally, when architecting for scalability and fault-tolerance, spread the load by using AWS ELB (Elastic Load Balancing) at the frontend. ELB creates highly scalable applications, by distributing load across EC2 instances, and also supports distributing load to multiple AZs.

Architecting for security. AWS provides Identity and Access Management (IAM) helps you to securely control access to AWS services and resources for your users. IAM supports temporary security credentials, and a common use case for IAMs is to set up identity federations to AWS APIs.

Some soundbites. A couple of nice soundbites from this presentation are "scalability: so your application is not a victim of its success" and "scaling is the ability to move the bottlenecks around to the least expensive part of the architecture".

After the talk, I approached the presenter and asked him: What about tightly-synchronized apps (for example transactional processing applications), how does AWS support them? His first answer is to scale vertically by using a bigger instance. When I asked about a scale-out solution, he said that there is no direct support for that. But a possible solution could be to use DynamoDB to record transaction state. DynamoDB provides consistency over its replicas, so it should be possible to leverage on that to build a scale-out transactional application.

Big Data (and Elastic MapReduce)

The first part of the talk introduced big data and the second part talked about Elastic MapReduce (EMR) for big data analytics.

With the accelerated rate of data generation the data volume grows rapidly, and storing and analyzing this data for actionable information becomes a challenge. Big data analysis have a lot of benefits. Razorfish agency analyzed credit card transaction data to improve advertising effectivenes, and achieved they achieved 500% return on ad spend by targeted advertisements. Yelp, an AWS customer, analyzed their usage logs and identified early on a bias for mobile usage, and invested heavily in the mobile development. In Jan 2013, 10 million unique mobile devices used Yelp. Social network data analysis keeps a tab on the pulse of the planet, and a lot of companies are analyzing social network data today for market analysis, product placement, etc.

EMR is AWS's managed Hadoop service. (Read here about MapReduce.) Hadoop has a robust ecosystem with several database and machine learning tools, and EMR benefits from that. EMR providesagility for experimentation, and also cost optimizations (due to its integration with AWS spot, name-your-own-price supercomputing).

AWS datapipeline helps manage and orchestrate data-intensive workloads via its pipeline automation service, and execution and rety logic. A basic pipeline is of the form "input-datanode" -> activity -> "output-datanode", but it is easily expandable with additional checks (precondition) and notifications (of faults), and arbitrary complex fanning out and fanning-in.

Partner & Solution Expo

There was a partner and solution expo as part of day 2 of the summit. The expo was more fun than I expected, there was a lot of energy in the room. You can see a list of companies in the expo under the event sponsors category at the AWS summit webpage.

Most of these companies offer some sort of cloud management solutions as-a-service (AAS) to cloud computing customers: security AAS, management AAS, scalability AAS, analytics AAS, database AAS. When I asked some of these companies "what prevents AWS from doing this cloud management support solutions themselves as part of AWS, and whether they feel threatened by that", they said "this is not AWS's business model". This seemed like a weak answer to me, because AWS has been continuously improving the management of its cloud computing services offerings to make it easier to use for the customers. Later when I asked the same question to an AWS guy, he told me that "These third parties should innovate faster than AWS otherwise they become irrelevant", which seemed like a more logical answer. Maybe the third parties can also differentiate by providing more customized service and support to companies, where AWS provides more generic services. After his forthcoming answer to this question, I asked the AWS guy, whether AWS is starting to eat IBM's lunch. He didn't comment on that. My take on this is that by democratizing IT services, AWS is enabling (will enable) many third parties to start digging into IBM's solutions/consulting market.

I talked with the AWS training people, they are in the process of preparing more training material for AWS. This will be very useful for developers, and also could be a good resource to include in the undergrad/grad distributed systems courses with project components.

I also talked with Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) people. They have customers from news and media companies, and were trying to make new connections in the expo. Maybe Amazon should look into integrating AMT with AWS and provide "crowdsourcing as a service" well-integrated to other AWS services.

Finally, I also chatted with the Eucalyptus people. Eucalyptus offers a private cloud solution compatible with AWS. Eucalyptus is opensource, with a business model similar to RedHat (providing support and training). They told me that their use-case is to enable you to test your applications in your private cloud in small-scale and then deploy at scale in AWS. But, that doesn't look like an essential service to me; I don't understand why one couldn't have done that initial testing on the AWS already. Their main competitor is OpenStack, which is backed by RackSpace and a large coalition. OpenStack has been gaining a lot of momentum in recent months.

Wrapping up

AWS is by far the top cloud computing provider, and it is slowly but surely building a datacenter OS, setting the standards and APIs for this along the way. AWS has currently 33 services (S3, RDS, DynamoDB, OpWorks, CloudWatch, CloudFront, ElastiCache, ELB, EMR, SQS, SNS, etc.) to support building cloud computing applications. I had the impression that AWS is about to see an explosion in its customer base. Most of the people I met during the summit have been using AWS in a limited way, and were currently investigating if or how they can use it more intensively.

During the expo session, I had a chance to approach Werner and make acquaintance. I am a tall guy, but he is really tall and big. He is very down-to-earth person; he stood in the AWS booth and met with AWS customers to listen and help for at least 2 hours.


PS: 17 presentations from the #AWS Summit in NYC are made available here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hints for Distributed Systems Design

-
This is with apologies to Butler Lampson, who published the " Hints for computer system design " paper 40 years ago in SOSP'83. I don't claim to match that work of course. I just thought I could draft this post to organize my thinking about designing distributed systems and get feedback from others. I start with the same  disclaimer Lampson gave. These hints are not novel, not foolproof recipes, not laws of design, not precisely formulated, and not always appropriate. They are just hints.  They are context dependent, and some of them may be controversial. That being said, I have seen these hints successfully applied in distributed systems design throughout my 25 years in the field, starting from the theory of distributed systems (98-01), immersing into the practice of wireless sensor networks (01-11), and working on cloud computing systems both in the academia and industry ever since. These heuristic principles have been applied knowingly or unknowingly and has proven...
Read more >>

Learning about distributed systems: where to start?

-
This is definitely not a "learn distributed systems in 21 days" post. I recommend a principled, from the foundations-up, studying of distributed systems, which will take a good three months in the first pass, and many more months to build competence after that. If you are practical and coding oriented you may not like my advice much. You may object saying, "Shouldn't I learn distributed systems with coding and hands on? Why can I not get started by deploying a Hadoop cluster, or studying the Raft code." I think that is the wrong way to go about learning distributed systems, because seeing similar code and programming language constructs will make you think this is familiar territory, and will give you a false sense of security. But, nothing can be further from the truth. Distributed systems need radically different software than centralized systems do.  --A. Tannenbaum This quotation is literally the first sentence in my distributed systems syllabus. Inst...
Read more >>

Making database systems usable

-
Image
C. J. Date's Sigmod 1983 keynote, "Database Usability", was prescient. Usability is the most important thing to the customers. They care less about impressive benchmarks or clever algorithms, and more about whether they can operate and use a database efficiently to query, update, analyze, and persist their data with minimal headache. (BTW, does anyone have a link to the contents of this Sigmod'83 talk? There is no transcript around, except for this short abstract .) The paper we cover today is from Sigmod 2007. It takes on the database usability problem raised in that 1983 keynote head-on, and calls out that the king is still naked.  Let's give some context for the year 2007. Yes, XML format was still popular then. The use-case in the paper is XQuery. The paper does not contain any  reference to json. MongoDB would be released in 2009 with the document model; and that seems to be great timing for some of the usability pains mentioned in the paper! Web 2.0 was in ...
Read more >>

Looming Liability Machines (LLMs)

-
As part of our zoom reading group ( wow, 4.5 years old now ), we discussed a paper that uses LLMs for automatic root cause analysis (RCA) for cloud incidents. This was a pretty straightforward application of LLMs. The proposed system employs an LLM to match incoming incidents to incident handlers based on their alert types, predicts the incident's root cause category, and provides an explanatory narrative. The only customization is through prompt-engineering. Since this is a custom domain, I think a more principled and custom-designed  machine learning system would be more appropriate rather than adopting LLMs. Anyways, the use of LLMs for RCAs spooked me vicerally. I couldn't find the exact words during the paper discussion, but I can articulate this better now. Let me explain. RCA is serious business Root cause analysis (RCA) is the process of identifying the underlying causes of a problem/incident, rather than just addressing its symptoms. One RCA heuristic is asking 5 Why...
Read more >>

Foundational distributed systems papers

-
I talked about the importance of reading foundational papers last week. To followup, here is my compilation of foundational papers in the distributed systems area. (I focused on the core distributed systems area, and did not cover networking, security, distributed ledgers, verification work etc. I even left out distributed transactions, I hope to cover them at a later date.)  I classified the papers by subject, and listed them in chronological order. I also listed expository papers and blog posts at the end of each section. Time and State in Distributed Systems Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System. Leslie Lamport, Commn. of the ACM,  1978. Distributed Snapshots: Determining Global States of a Distributed System. K. Mani Chandy Leslie Lamport, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 1985. Virtual Time and Global States of Distributed Systems.  Mattern, F. 1988. Practical uses of synchronized clocks in distributed systems. B. Liskov, 1991. Exp...
Read more >>

Advice to the young

-
Image
I notice I haven't written any advice posts recently. Here is a collection of my advice posts pre 2020. I've been feeling all this elderly wisdom pent up in me, ready to pour at any moment. So here it goes. Get ready to quench your thirst from my fount of wisdom. No man, think for yourself, only get what works for you. It is called foundations, not theory Foundations of computer science (or rather any field of study) are the most important topics you can learn. These lay down the frame of thinking/perspective for that area of study. Yet, I am saddened to hear these called as "theory", and labeled as "unpractical". This couldn't be farther from the truth. Take a look at how I recommend studying distributed systems . Don't you dare call this "theory" and "unpractical". This lays the bedrock that you build your practice on. Don't skimp on the foundations. Don't build your home on quicksand. Keep your hands dirty, your mind cl...
Read more >>

Linearizability: A Correctness Condition for Concurrent Objects

-
Image
This paper is from Herlihy and Wing appeared in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 1990. This is the canonical reference for the linearizability definition. I had not read this paper in detail before, so I thought it would be good to go to the source to see if there are additional delightful surprises in the original text. Hence, this post. I will dive into a technical analysis of the paper first, and then discuss some of my takes toward the end. I had written an accessible explanation of linearizability earlier; you may want to read that first. I will assume an understanding of linearizability to keep this review at reasonable length. Introduction I love how the old papers just barge in with the model, without bothered by pleasantries such as motivation of the problem. These are the first two sentences of the introduction. "A concurrent system consists of a collection of sequential processes that communicate through shared typed objects . This model encompass...
Read more >>

Understanding the Performance Implications of Storage-Disaggregated Databases

-
Image
Storage-compute disaggregation in databases has emerged as a pivotal architecture in cloud environments, as evidenced by Amazon ( Aurora ), Microsoft ( Socrates ), Google (AlloyDB), Alibaba ( PolarDB ), and Huawei (Taurus). This approach decouples compute from storage, allowing for independent and elastic scaling of compute and storage resources. It provides fault-tolerance at the storage level. You can then share the storage for other services, such as adding read-only replicas for the databases. You can even use the storage level for easier sharding of your database. Finally, you can also use this for exporting a changelog asynchronously to feed into peripheral cloud services, such as analytics. Disaggregated architecture was the topic of Sigmod 23 panel . I think this quote summarizes the industry's thinking on the topic. "Disaggregated architecture is here, and is not going anywhere. In a disaggregated architecture, storage is fungible, and computing scales independently. ...
Read more >>

Scalable OLTP in the Cloud: What’s the BIG DEAL?

-
Image
This paper is from Pat Helland, the apostate philosopher of database systems, overall a superb person, and a good friend of mine. The paper appeared this week at CIDR'24. (Check out the program for other interesting papers). The motivating question behind this work is: " What are the asymptotic limits to scale for cloud OLTP (OnLine Transaction Processing) systems? " Pat says that the CIDR 2023 paper "Is Scalable OLTP in the Cloud a Solved Problem?" prompted this question.  The answer to the question? Pat says that the answer lies in the joint responsibility of database and the application. If you know of Pat's work, which I have summarized several in this blog , you would know that Pat has been advocating along these lines before. But this paper provides a very crisp, specific, concrete answer. Read on for my summary of the paper. Disclaimer: This is a wisdom and technical information/detail packed 13-page paper, so I will try my best to summarize the sa...
Read more >>

Designing Data Intensive Applications (DDIA) Book

-
Image
We started reading this book as part of Alex Petrov's book club . We just got started, so you can join us, by joining the discord channel above. We meet Wednesday's 11am Eastern Time.  Previously we had read transaction processing book by Grey and Reuters. This page links to my summaries of that book. Chp 1. Reliable, Scalable, and Maintainable Applications I love the diagrams opening each chapter. Beautiful! The first chapter consists of warm up stuff. It talks about the definitions of reliabilty, scalability, and maintainability. It is still engaging, because  it is written with an educator and technical blogger voice, rather than a dry academic voice. This book came out on 2017. Martin is working on the new version. So if you have comments for things to focus on for the new version, it would be helpful to collect them in a document and email it to Martin. For example, I am curious about how the below paragraph from the Preface will get revised with 8 more years of hindsight...
Read more >>